Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners
Public DepositedAdd to collection
You do not have access to any existing collections. You may create a new collection.
Downloadable Content
Download PDFCitation
MLA
Jensen, Todd M, et al. Developing a Practice-driven Research Agenda In Implementation Science: Perspectives From Experienced Implementation Support Practitioners. SAGE Publications, 2023. https://doi.org/10.17615/vf5g-bn41APA
Jensen, T., Metz, A., Disbennett, M., & Farley, A. (2023). Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.17615/vf5g-bn41Chicago
Jensen, Todd M., Allison J Metz, Mackensie E Disbennett, and Amanda B Farley. 2023. Developing a Practice-Driven Research Agenda In Implementation Science: Perspectives From Experienced Implementation Support Practitioners. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.17615/vf5g-bn41- Creator
-
Jensen, Todd M.
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6930-899X
- Affiliation: School of Social Work
-
Metz, Allison J.
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-7021
- Affiliation: School of Social Work
-
Disbennett, Mackensie E.
- Affiliation: School of Social Work
-
Farley, Amanda B.
- Affiliation: School of Social Work
- Abstract
- Background Attention is being placed on the “ironic gap” or “secondary” research-to-practice gap in the field of implementation science. Among several challenges posited to exacerbate this research-to-practice gap, we call attention to one challenge in particular—the relative dearth of implementation research that is tethered intimately to the lived experiences of implementation support practitioners (ISPs). The purpose of this study is to feature a qualitative approach to engaging with highly experienced ISPs to inform the development of a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science. In general, we aim to encourage ongoing empirical inquiry that foregrounds practice-driven implementation research questions. Method Our analytic sample was comprised of 17 professionals in different child and family service systems, each with long-term experience using implementation science frameworks to support change efforts. Data were collected via in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Our analysis followed a qualitative content analysis approach. Our focal conceptual category centered on the desired areas of future research highlighted by respondents, with subcategories reflecting subsets of related research question ideas. Results Interviews yielded varying responses that could help shape a practice-driven research agenda for the field of implementation science. The following subcategories regarding desired areas for future research were identified in respondents’ answers: (a) stakeholder engagement and developing trusting relationships, (b) evidence use, (c) workforce development, and (d) cost-effective implementation. Conclusions There is significant promise in bringing implementation research and implementation practice together more closely and building a practice-informed research agenda to shape implementation science. Our findings point not only to valuable practice-informed gaps in the literature that could be filled by implementation researchers, but also topics for which dissemination and translation efforts may not have yielded optimal reach. We also highlight the value in ISPs bolstering their own capacity for engaging with the implementation science literature to the fullest extent possible.
- Plain Language Summary In the field of implementation science, increasing attention is being placed on the “ironic gap” or “secondary” research-to-practice gap. This gap reflects a general lag or disconnect between implementation research and implementation practice, often stemming from knowledge generated by implementation research not being accessible to or applied by professionals who support implementation efforts in various service-delivery systems. Several explanations for the research-to-practice gap in implementation science have been offered in recent years; the authors highlight one notable challenge that may be exacerbating the research-to-practice gap in this field, namely that implementation research often remains disconnected from the lived experiences of implementation support practitioners. In this paper, the authors demonstrate the promise of developing a practice-drive research agenda in implementation science, with specific research question ideas offered by highly experienced implementation support practitioners. The paper concludes by expressing enthusiasm for future efforts to bring implementation research and implementation practice together more closely, empirically foreground practice-driven implementation research questions, translate and disseminate existing implementation research findings more widely, and build the capacity of implementation support practitioners to fully engage with the implementation science literature.
- Date of publication
- September 3, 2023
- Keyword
- DOI
- Identifier
- Resource type
- Article
- Rights statement
- In Copyright
- Rights holder
- SAGE Publications Ltd and the Society for Implementation Research Colloboration, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
- Journal title
- Implementation Research and Practice
- Journal volume
- 4
- Funder
- William T. Grant Foundation
- ISSN
- 2633-4895
- Copyright date
- 2023
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
Relations
- Parents:
- In Collection:
This work has no parents.
Items
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.1177_26334895231199063.pdf | 2023-09-05 | Public | Download |