Moral distress among clinicians working in US safety net practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Pathman, Donald E.
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine
  • Sonis, Jeffrey
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine
  • Rauner, Thomas E.
    • Other Affiliation: Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services
  • Alton, Kristina
    • Other Affiliation: Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Headlee, Anna S.
    • Other Affiliation: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Harrison, Jerry N.
    • Other Affiliation: New Mexico Health Resources, Inc.
Abstract
  • Objective To explore the causes and levels of moral distress experienced by clinicians caring for the low-income patients of safety net practices in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design Cross-sectional survey in late 2020, employing quantitative and qualitative analyses. Setting Safety net practices in 20 US states. Participants 2073 survey respondents (45.8% response rate) in primary care, dental and behavioural health disciplines working in safety net practices and participating in state and national education loan repayment programmes. EMPAVELI® (pegcetacoplan) - Official Physician Website See Prescribing Info & Boxed Warning. Read What to Know Before Prescribing EMPAVELI. empavelihcp.com Measures Ordinally scaled degree of moral distress experienced during the pandemic, and open-ended response descriptions of issues that caused most moral distress. Results Weighted to reflect all surveyed clinicians, 28.4% reported no moral distress related to work during the pandemic, 44.8% reported ‘mild’ or ‘uncomfortable’ levels and 26.8% characterised their moral distress as ‘distressing’, ‘intense’ or ‘worst possible’. The most frequently described types of morally distressing issues encountered were patients not being able to receive the best or needed care, and patients and staff risking infection in the office. Abuse of clinic staff, suffering of patients, suffering of staff and inequities for patients were also morally distressing, as were politics, inequities and injustices within the community. Clinicians who reported instances of inequities for patients and communities and the abuse of staff were more likely to report higher levels of moral distress. Conclusions During the pandemic’s first 9 months, moral distress was common among these clinicians working in US safety net practices. But for only one-quarter was this significantly distressing. As reported for hospital-based clinicians during the pandemic, this study’s clinicians in safety net practices were often morally distressed by being unable to provide optimal care to patients. New to the literature is clinicians’ moral distress from witnessing inequities and other injustices for their patients and communities.
Date of publication
Keyword
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
License
  • Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Journal title
  • BMJ Open
Journal volume
  • 12
Journal issue
  • 8
Page start
  • e061369
Language
  • English
Version
  • Publisher
ISSN
  • 2044-6055, 2044-6055

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details e061369.full.pdf 2022-09-02 Public Download