A systematic approach to the planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of integrated health services Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Creator
  • Reynolds, Heidi
    • Affiliation: Carolina Population Center
    • Other Affiliation: MEASURE Evaluation
  • Sutherland, Elizabeth G
    • Affiliation: Carolina Population Center
    • Other Affiliation: MEASURE Evaluation
Abstract
  • Abstract: Background: Because of the current emphasis and enthusiasm focused on integration of health systems, there is a risk of piling resources into integrated strategies without the necessary systems in place to monitor their progress adequately or to measure impact, and to learn from these efforts. The rush to intervene without adequate monitoring and evaluation will continue to result in a weak evidence base for decision making and resource allocation. Program planning and implementation are inextricability linked to monitoring and evaluation. Country level guidance is needed to identify country-specific integrated strategies, thereby increasing country ownership. Discussion: This paper focuses on integrated health services but takes into account how health services are influenced by the health system, managed by programs, and made up of interventions. We apply the principles in existing comprehensive monitoring and evaluation (M&E) frameworks in order to outline a systematic approach to the M&E of integration for the country level. The approach is grounded by first defining the country-specific health challenges that integration is intended to affect. Priority points of contact for care can directly influence health, and essential packages of integration for all major client presentations need to be defined. Logic models are necessary to outline the plausible causal pathways and define the inputs, roles and responsibilities, indicators, and data sources across the health system. Finally, we recommend improvements to the health information system and in data use to ensure that data are available to inform decisions, because changes in the M&E function to make it more integrated will also facilitate integration in the service delivery, planning, and governance components. Summary: This approach described in the paper is the ideal, but its application at the country level can help reveal gaps and guide decisions related to what health services to prioritize for integration, help plan for how to strengthen systems to support health services, and ultimately establish an evidence base to inform investments in health care. More experience is needed to understand if the approach is feasible; similarly, more emphasis is needed on documenting the process of designing and implemented integrated interventions at the national level.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Rights holder
  • Heidi W Reynolds et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
License
Journal title
  • BMC Health Services Research
Journal volume
  • 13
Journal issue
  • 1
Page start
  • 168
Language
  • English
Is the article or chapter peer-reviewed?
  • Yes
ISSN
  • 1472-6963
Bibliographic citation
  • BMC Health Services Research. 2013 May 06;13(1):168
Access
  • Open Access
Publisher
  • BioMed Central Ltd
Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items