The importance of accurate road data for spatial applications in public health: customizing a road network

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Frizzelle, Brian G
    • Carolina Population Center
  • Evenson, Kelly
    • Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
  • Rodriguez, Daniel
    • College of Arts and Sciences, Department of City and Regional Planning
  • Laraia, Barbara A
    • Other Affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
Abstract
  • Background Health researchers have increasingly adopted the use of geographic information systems (GIS) for analyzing environments in which people live and how those environments affect health. One aspect of this research that is often overlooked is the quality and detail of the road data and whether or not it is appropriate for the scale of analysis. Many readily available road datasets, both public domain and commercial, contain positional errors or generalizations that may not be compatible with highly accurate geospatial locations. This study examined the accuracy, completeness, and currency of four readily available public and commercial sources for road data (North Carolina Department of Transportation, StreetMap Pro, TIGER/Line 2000, TIGER/Line 2007) relative to a custom road dataset which we developed and used for comparison. Methods and Results A custom road network dataset was developed to examine associations between health behaviors and the environment among pregnant and postpartum women living in central North Carolina in the United States. Three analytical measures were developed to assess the comparative accuracy and utility of four publicly and commercially available road datasets and the custom dataset in relation to participants' residential locations over three time periods. The exclusion of road segments and positional errors in the four comparison road datasets resulted in between 5.9% and 64.4% of respondents lying farther than 15.24 meters from their nearest road, the distance of the threshold set by the project to facilitate spatial analysis. Agreement, using a Pearson's correlation coefficient, between the customized road dataset and the four comparison road datasets ranged from 0.01 to 0.82. Conclusion This study demonstrates the importance of examining available road datasets and assessing their completeness, accuracy, and currency for their particular study area. This paper serves as an example for assessing the feasibility of readily available commercial or public road datasets, and outlines the steps by which an improved custom dataset for a study area can be developed.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Rights holder
  • Brian G Frizzelle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
License
Journal title
  • International Journal of Health Geographics
Journal volume
  • 8
Journal issue
  • 1
Page start
  • 24
Language
  • English
Is the article or chapter peer-reviewed?
  • Yes
ISSN
  • 1476-072X
Bibliographic citation
  • International Journal of Health Geographics. 2009 May 01;8(1):24
Publisher
  • BioMed Central Ltd
Access right
  • Open Access
Date uploaded
  • August 23, 2012

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 1476-072X-8-24.pdf August 23, 2012 Public Download
file details 1476-072X-8-24.xml August 23, 2012 Public Download