A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)? Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
  • Lunde, Asger
    • Other Affiliation: Department of Information Science, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark
  • Hansen, Peter R.
    • Other Affiliation: Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence, USA
  • We compare 330 ARCH‐type models in terms of their ability to describe the conditional variance. The models are compared out‐of‐sample using DM–$ exchange rate data and IBM return data, where the latter is based on a new data set of realized variance. We find no evidence that a GARCH(1,1) is outperformed by more sophisticated models in our analysis of exchange rates, whereas the GARCH(1,1) is clearly inferior to models that can accommodate a leverage effect in our analysis of IBM returns. The models are compared with the test for superior predictive ability (SPA) and the reality check for data snooping (RC). Our empirical results show that the RC lacks power to an extent that makes it unable to distinguish ‘good’ and ‘bad’ models in our analysis.
Date of publication
  • doi:10.1002/jae.800
  • 2-s2.0-19644379708
Related resource URL
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Journal title
  • Journal of Applied Econometrics
Journal volume
  • 20
Journal issue
  • 7
Page start
  • 873
Page end
  • 889
  • English
  • Postprint
  • 0883-7252

This work has no parents.