Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Elston Lafata, J.
    • Affiliation: Eshelman School of Pharmacy
  • Shires, D.A.
    • Other Affiliation: Michigan State University
  • Shin, Y.
    • Other Affiliation: Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Flocke, S.
    • Other Affiliation: Oregon Health and Science University
  • Resnicow, K.
    • Other Affiliation: University of Michigan
  • Johnson, M.
    • Affiliation: Eshelman School of Pharmacy
  • Nixon, E.
    • Other Affiliation: Henry Ford Health System
  • Sun, X.
    • Other Affiliation: Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Hawley, S.
    • Other Affiliation: University of Michigan
Abstract
  • Background Even after a physician recommendation, many people remain unscreened for colorectal cancer (CRC). The proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs) and tethered online portals may afford new opportunities to embed patient-facing interventions within clinic workflows and engage patients following a physician recommendation for care. We evaluated the effectiveness of a patient-facing intervention designed to complement physician office-based recommendations for CRC screening. Design Using a 2-arm pragmatic, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the intervention's effect on CRC screening use as documented in the EHR (primary outcome) and the extent to which the intervention reached the target population. Trial participants were insured, aged 50 to 75 y, with a physician recommendation for CRC screening. Typical EHR functionalities, including patient registries, health maintenance flags, best practice alerts, and secure messaging, were used to support research-related activities and deliver the intervention to enrolled patients. Results A total of 1,825 adults consented to trial participation, of whom 78% completed a baseline survey and were exposed to the intervention. Most trial participants (>80%) indicated an intent to be screened on the baseline survey, and 65% were screened at follow-up, with no significant differences by study arm. One-third of eligible patients were sent a secure message. Among those, more than three-quarters accessed study material. Conclusions By leveraging common EHR functionalities, we integrated a patient-facing intervention within clinic workflows. Despite practice integration, the intervention did not improve screening use, likely in part due to portal-based interventions not reaching those for whom the intervention may be most effective. Implications Embedding patient-facing interventions within the EHR enabled practice integration but may minimize program effectiveness by missing important segments of the patient population. Highlights Electronic health record tools can be used to facilitate practice-embedded pragmatic trial and patient-facing intervention processes, including patient identification, study arm allocation, and intervention delivery. The online portal-embedded intervention did not improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake following a physician recommendation, likely in part because portal users tend to be already highly engaged with healthcare. Relying on patient portals alone for CRC screening interventions may not alter screening use and could exacerbate well-known care disparities.
Date of publication
Keyword
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
License
  • Attribution 4.0 International
Journal title
  • Medical Decision Making
Journal volume
  • 42
Journal issue
  • 8
Page start
  • 985
Page end
  • 998
Language
  • English
Version
  • Publisher
Funder
  • National Cancer Institute, NCI
ISSN
  • 0272-989X
Publisher
  • SAGE Publications Ltd

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 0272989x221104094.pdf 2023-01-12 Public Download