Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States: living density, viral load, and disproportionate impact on communities of color

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Cerami, Carla
  • Popkin-Hall, Zachary R
  • Rapp, Tyler
  • Tompkins, Kathleen
  • Zhang, Haoming
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Muller, Meredith S
  • Basham, Christopher
  • Whittelsey, Maureen
  • Chhetri, Srijana B
  • Smith, Judy
  • Litel, Christy
  • Lin, Kelly D
  • Churiwal, Mehal
  • Khan, Salman
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology
  • Rubinstein, Rebecca
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Claman, Faith
  • Mollan, Katie
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Wohl, David
  • Premkumar, Lakshmanane
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology
  • Powers, Kimberly A
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Juliano, Jonathan J
  • Lin, Feng-Chang
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Lin, Jessica T
Abstract
  • Households are hotspots for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In the US, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color. Between April-October 2020, the CO-HOST prospective cohort study enrolled 100 COVID-19 cases and 208 of their household members in North Carolina, including 44% who identified as Hispanic or non-white. Households were enrolled a median of 6 days from symptom onset in the index case. Incident secondary cases within the household were detected by quantitative PCR of weekly nasal swabs (days 7, 14, 21) or by seroconversion at day 28.Excluding 73 household contacts who were PCR-positive at baseline, the secondary attack rate among household contacts was 32% (33/103, 95% CI 22%-44%). The majority of cases occurred by day 7, with later cases confirmed as household-acquired by viral sequencing. Infected persons in the same household had similar nasopharyngeal viral loads (ICC=0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.62). Households with secondary transmission had index cases with a median viral load that was 1.4 log10 higher than households without transmission (p=0.03) as well as higher living density (>3 persons occupying <6 rooms) (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.02-10.9). Minority households were more likely to experience high living density and had a higher risk of incident infection than did white households (SAR 51% vs. 19%, p=0.01).Household crowding in the context of high-inoculum infections may amplify the spread of COVID-19, potentially contributing to disproportionate impact on communities of color.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Journal title
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
Language
  • English
Version
  • Postprint
ISSN
  • 1058-4838

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details ciab701.pdf 2021-08-31 Public Download