Ethical inclusion: Risks and benefits of research from the perspective of perinatal people with opioid use disorders who have experienced incarceration

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Reddy, Julia
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Maternal and Child Health
  • Black, Kristel
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine
  • Bazemore, Keia
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Jordan, Kiva
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Jackson, Jamie B.
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Knittel, Andrea K.
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
  • Background Research ethics guidelines and emphasis on representation in research guide the inclusion of marginalized groups, including people with perinatal opioid use disorders (OUD) and people experiencing incarceration in the United States. However, insights from participants regarding the risks and benefits of participation are not adequately considered. The aim of this study was to examine the risks and benefits of research participation from the perspective of pregnant/postpartum people with OUD who have experienced incarceration. Design We recruited people who had experience with perinatal incarceration and were either currently pregnant or postpartum, and at least 18 years old. All participants met the clinical criteria for OUD. Our study did not have exclusion criteria based on gender, race, or ethnicity. Setting Participants were either currently incarcerated at the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women in Raleigh, North Carolina, United States or had previously experienced perinatal incarceration and were recruited from a perinatal substance use disorder treatment program located in North Carolina. Participants Between 9/2021-4/2022, we completed 12 interviews with pregnant/postpartum people with OUD, approximately half who were currently incarcerated and half with a recent history of perinatal incarceration. Intervention/measurement Interviews were conducted via Webex phone or video. The interviews followed a scripted interview guide and lasted one hour on average. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction technique to produce an overarching thematic framework. Findings Our analysis identified benefits, including the personal advantage of self-expression, helping others and contributing to change, and financial incentives. Risks included stigma and breach of confidentiality, misunderstanding of the distinction between research and advocacy, and limited ability to share their whole experience. Conclusions Participant-identified benefits of research mirrored those from other marginalized populations, though participant-identified risks were novel and nuanced. Recruitment and consent should move beyond normative research ethics committees protocol language to consider the perspectives of participants.
Date of publication
Keyword
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
License
  • Attribution 4.0 International
Journal title
  • PLOS ONE
Journal volume
  • 18
Journal issue
  • 11
Page start
  • e0294604
Language
  • English
Version
  • Publisher
ISSN
  • 1932-6203
Publisher
  • Public Library of Science

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details journal.pone.0294604.pdf 2023-12-05 Public Download