How the nature of expression constitutes a problem for expressivism Public Deposited

Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Accessible Version
Last Modified
  • March 21, 2019
Creator
  • Sias, James
    • Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Philosophy
Abstract
  • Expressivism in ethics is the view that moral language functions to express only the conative mental states of speakers. After distinguishing between two different senses of expression, and three different ways in which the expressivist might account for the expressive function of moral language, I explain that expressivists owe us an account of how it is that speakers express their mental states by making moral claims. Then I go on to develop just such an account, and in the end, the account puts expressivists in an awkward position. For if my account of expression is on point, then either (a) expressivists are committed to saying that competent users of moral language are often confused (perhaps even systematically so) about their own mental states and their own reasons for action, or (b) expressivism is false.
Date of publication
DOI
Resource type
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Advisor
  • Bar-On, Dorit
Degree granting institution
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Language
Access
  • Open access
Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
Dv13zt879?file=thumbnail How the nature of expression constitutes a problem for expressivism 2019-04-11 Public