The Inclusivist Anomaly Is Not an Anomaly: A Reply to Buchanan and Powell Public Deposited

Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Last Modified
  • March 22, 2019
Creator
  • Porter, John
    • Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Philosophy
Abstract
  • In their forthcoming book The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory, Allen Buchanan and Russell Powell argue that evolutionary theory cannot explain the inclusivist anomaly—the relatively recent emergence of inclusivist moral commitments such as commitments to abolition or human rights—because the motivations which brought about the inclusivist anomaly are not accounted for by evolutionary theory. I argue, pace Buchanan and Powell, that evolutionary theory can account for the motivations which brought about the inclusivist anomaly, and that the inclusivist anomaly is therefore not an anomaly after all.
Date of publication
Keyword
DOI
Resource type
Advisor
  • Postema, Gerald J.
  • Bovens, Luc
  • Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey
Degree
  • Master of Arts
Degree granting institution
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Graduation year
  • 2018
Language
Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
Porter_unc_0153M_17736.pdf 2019-04-09 Public