Sleeping with the enemy: winning coalitions against within-group power transitions and unstable civil war settlements Public Deposited
Downloadable ContentDownload PDF
- Last Modified
- March 22, 2019
- Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Political Science
- In many civil wars, each warring side often consists of multiple internal groups. In such a case, a leader's political survival may be threatened not only by fighting with the enemy but also by power competition among in-groups. Within-group power transitions refer to a situation in which a dominant group is overtaken by a challenger group on the same warring side. In this paper, I argue that the risk of within-group power transitions creates an incentive to negotiate peace with an enemy side. Assuming recruiting enough supporters is the sine qua non of a dominant group's status, attracting extra supporters would provide insurance against internal power transitions. Given the internal power competition, negotiated settlements help a dominant leader save more resources to recruit additional supporters by minimizing the uncertainty from fighting with an enemy. Thus, negotiated settlements are beneficial to control internal rivals. A leader's consideration for such a strategic settlement, however, inevitably entails the risk of the conflict recurring.
- Date of publication
- May 2010
- Resource type
- Rights statement
- In Copyright
- Crescenzi, Mark J. C.
- Degree granting institution
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Open access
This work has no parents.
|Sleeping with the enemy : winning coalitions against within-group power transitions and unstable civil war settlements||2019-04-12||Public||