A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Irrigation Methods in the Removal of Bacteria from Root Canals Following Instrumentation Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Last Modified
  • March 19, 2019
  • Johnson, Keenon L.
    • Affiliation: School of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
  • The purpose of this in vivo study was to investigate the antimicrobial effectiveness of 6% sodium hypochlorite, when used with the conventional irrigation technique using a 30 gauge side-vented needle, the EndoVacTM System, and the ProUltra PiezoFlowTM Ultrasonic Irrigation Needle. It was hypothesized that both the EndoVacTM system and the PiezoFlowTM Ultrasonic Irrigation Needle would remove bacteria from root canals more effectively than irrigation using a 30 gauge side-vented needle. After obtaining informed consent from each subject, teeth were randomly divided into three treatment groups (n=30), and samples were collected following instrumentation and irrigation using one of the three irrigation techniques. The samples were cultured under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and bacteria growth was measured by direct counting of colonies and grid specific calculations. Conclusions: The data indicated that the 30 gauge side-vented needle and the EndoVacTM System removed significantly more bacteria than the ProUltra PiezoFlowTM Ultrasonic Irrigation Needle.
Date of publication
Resource type
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
  • "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry"
  • Rivera, Eric M.
Place of publication
  • Chapel Hill, NC
  • Open access

This work has no parents.