An Empirical Comparison of Three Psychometric Measures of Adolescent Substance Use Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Last Modified
  • February 26, 2019
  • Brinberg, Miriam
    • Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience
  • Adolescent substance use is common and often accompanied by many negative consequences. The psychometric assessment of substance use, however, is highly varied and may misrepresent actual substance use. Given the importance of understanding adolescent substance use, this study examined three competing measurement models of substance use and their differential predictability of academic achievement and internalizing and externalizing symptomatology. Participants were drawn from the public-use Add Health data set (N = 5,857). The three measurement models were determined from seven items that assessed the lifetime use of cigarettes, chewing tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, inhalants, and other illicit drugs. The first measurement model (lifetime use) grouped participants as abstainers (never used a drug) and users (used at least one drug). The second measurement model (proportion) refined substance users by accounting for the proportion of the seven drugs they endorsed. The final measurement model further refined substance users by creating factor scores through confirmatory factor analysis that allow each item to be differentially weighted as a function of severity. Nine separate regression analyses were estimated in which age, race, gender, and substance use measurement model predicted either academic achievement or externalizing or internalizing symptomatology. These analyses indicated that all three substance use measures were significant predictors of each outcome measure, but the proportion and factor score models accounted for substantially more of the variance within each model. These results suggest the proportion or factor score models would be better predictors of substance use, although the choice of model should be based on relevant theory.
Date of publication
Resource type
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
  • Funding: None
  • Curran, Patrick
  • Bachelor of Science
Honors level
  • Highest Honors
Degree granting institution
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 55 p.

This work has no parents.