Where Google Stands on Art: An Evaluation of Content Coverage in Online Databases
Public Deposited- Last Modified
- February 28, 2019
- Creator
-
Noll, Hannah M.
- Affiliation: School of Information and Library Science
- Abstract
- This study evaluates the content coverage of Google Scholar and three commercial databases (Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Bibliography of the History of Art and Art Full Text/Art Index Retrospective) on the subject of art history. Each database is tested using a bibliography method and evaluated based on Péter Jacsó's scope criteria for online databases. Of the 472 articles tested, Google Scholar indexed the smallest number of citations (35%), outshone by the Arts & Humanities Citation Index which covered 73% of the test set. This content evaluation also examines specific aspects of coverage to find that in comparison to the other databases, Google Scholar provides consistent coverage over the time range tested (1975-2008) and considerable access to article abstracts (56%). Google Scholar failed, however, to fully index the most frequently cited art periodical in the test set, the Artforum International. Finally, Google Scholar's total citation count is inflated by a significant percentage (23%) of articles which include duplicate, triplicate or multiple versions of the same record.
- Date of publication
- April 2008
- Subject
- DOI
- Resource type
- Rights statement
- In Copyright
- Advisor
- Pomerantz, Jeffrey
- Degree granting institution
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Language
- Extent
- 43 p.
- Access
- Open access
Relations
- Parents:
This work has no parents.
Items
| Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Where Google Stands on Art: An Evaluation of Content Coverage in Online Databases. | 2019-05-13 | Public | Download |