ingest
cdrApp
2017-08-15T23:15:48.368Z
d91e81c8-5a8a-4e8a-976c-cad4e396e5ee
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-08-15T23:16:15.873Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-08-15T23:16:24.946Z
Setting exclusive relation
addDatastream
MD_TECHNICAL
fedoraAdmin
2017-08-15T23:16:34.030Z
Adding technical metadata derived by FITS
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-08-15T23:16:52.240Z
Setting exclusive relation
addDatastream
MD_FULL_TEXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-08-15T23:17:02.531Z
Adding full text metadata extracted by Apache Tika
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-08-15T23:17:20.603Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
cdrApp
2017-08-22T14:00:13.751Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-01-25T03:30:23.282Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-01-27T04:09:13.115Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-03-13T23:58:29.908Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-05-16T21:33:05.174Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-07-10T22:28:23.317Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-07-17T18:35:32.936Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-08-08T18:02:04.138Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-08-15T15:10:01.685Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-08-16T18:12:56.820Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-09-21T15:41:00.244Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-09-26T18:47:39.637Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-10-11T19:28:08.207Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2019-02-28T02:57:42.404Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2019-03-19T22:15:04.758Z
Ryan
Cronk
Author
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery.
Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures.
Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
Summer 2017
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery
improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive
improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are
recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward
universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more
data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed
beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data
are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the
reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring
data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service
delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central
America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased
by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I
systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage
estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income
countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation.
Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural
setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier
analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation
performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new
accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of
human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities
that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable
for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and
appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control
measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be
derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major
opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based
decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve
water and sanitation service delivery.
Summer 2017
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation,
water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting
institution
Environmental Sciences and
Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
Summer 2017
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017-08
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Pete
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Pete
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Degree granting institution
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene; low- and middle-income countries; sanitation; water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Peter
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene, low- and middle-income countries, sanitation, water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Pete
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene; low- and middle-income countries; sanitation; water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Pete
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Ryan
Cronk
Creator
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Gillings School of Global Public Health
Using monitoring data to identify water and sanitation service delivery improvement opportunities in low- and middle-income countries
Universal access to basic sanitation and water services and their progressive improvement are important for human development, health, and human rights; and are recognized in program, national, and international policies such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Monitoring data are important for measuring progress toward universal access and improvements in service levels. In the SDG era, substantially more data will become available with new and expanded monitoring. These data can be analyzed beyond their immediate purpose to answer policy-relevant questions. However, these data are underused for service delivery research and there are opportunities to improve the reliability and quality of monitoring. To address these challenges, I analyzed monitoring data to identify opportunities to improve monitoring and water and sanitation service delivery. Using water supply infrastructure data from sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, Bayesian networks predicted water system functionality and continuity increased by as many as 20 percentage points when best-observed conditions were in place. I systematically compiled health care facility (HCF) datasets to produce the first coverage estimates for 21 indicators of environmental conditions in HCFs in low- and middle-income countries, where 52% of HCFs lack piped water and 30% lack improved sanitation. Statistically significant inequalities in coverage exist between HCFs by urban-rural setting, managing authority, facility type, and administrative unit. Using frontier analysis, I transformed household monitoring data into indicators of water and sanitation performance. Water and sanitation performance analysis provides policymakers with a new accountability instrument for assessing country progress on meeting full realization of human rights obligations. There are many simple data collection improvement opportunities that do not add substantial cost or burden which would make monitoring data more valuable for service delivery research. Improvement opportunities include the use of: relevant and appropriate survey questions, clear definitions, and quality assurance/quality control measures. Together, these studies demonstrate substantial, unrealized value that can be derived from monitoring. Monitoring improvements and analysis of these data are major opportunities to make better use of limited resources, inform evidence-based decision-making for better management, policy, programming, and practice, and improve water and sanitation service delivery.
2017
Environmental engineering
Public health
hygiene; low- and middle-income countries; sanitation; water
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Jamie
Bartram
Thesis advisor
Clarissa
Brocklehurst
Thesis advisor
Richard
Johnston
Thesis advisor
Pete
Kolsky
Thesis advisor
Mark
Sobsey
Thesis advisor
text
2017-08
Cronk_unc_0153D_17210.pdf
uuid:c27f333e-bcb5-49ce-ae54-ace44138e3da
2019-08-15T00:00:00
2017-07-27T10:37:12Z
proquest
application/pdf
4005657
yes