ingest
cdrApp
2017-07-06T12:39:19.317Z
ccd64451-f0fc-4a42-94ad-226f4041fa4f
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
cdrApp
2017-07-06T13:17:25.588Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-07-06T13:22:57.231Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-07-06T13:23:06.319Z
Setting exclusive relation
addDatastream
MD_TECHNICAL
fedoraAdmin
2017-07-06T13:23:14.704Z
Adding technical metadata derived by FITS
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-07-06T13:23:30.920Z
Setting exclusive relation
addDatastream
MD_FULL_TEXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-07-06T13:23:40.232Z
Adding full text metadata extracted by Apache Tika
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2017-07-06T13:23:56.279Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-01-25T10:59:05.348Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-01-27T11:10:38.348Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-03-14T08:04:45.365Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-05-17T19:35:21.718Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-07-11T06:38:18.162Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-07-18T02:49:28.442Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-08-16T16:00:53.503Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-09-27T02:27:50.361Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-10-12T03:00:29.790Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2019-03-20T21:24:16.431Z
Joshua
Miller
Author
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
Spring 2017
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic
political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their
philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts
about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that
Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests,
they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically
sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to
real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and
practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This
project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice
open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of
experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful
considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to
engaging in continuous reflection.
Spring 2017
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato,
Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting
institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
Spring 2017
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017-05
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
CDC
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
C.D.C.
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Degree granting institution
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle; Democracy; Judgment; Plato; Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
C.D.C.
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Degree granting institution
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle, Democracy, Judgment, Plato, Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Political Science
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
C.D.C.
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
Joshua
Miller
Creator
Department of Political Science
College of Arts and Sciences
Democracy and Judgment in Ancient Greek Political Thought
This dissertation examines practical and ethical dimensions of democratic political judgment in the works of Thucydides, Plato and Aristotle. Despite their philosophical and methodological differences, each of these thinkers raised similar doubts about the wisdom of fifth- and fourth-century Athenian decision-making. Arguing that Athenian policy debates tended to privilege short-term gains over longer-term interests, they suggested that moral reflection might guide political judgments toward more ethically sustainable ends. By showing how Greek political philosophy developed in response to real-world political problems, I demonstrate a dialectical relationship between theory and practice that is often overlooked in the scholarship surrounding these figures. This project also contributes to ongoing debates that depict political judgment as a practice open to radically democratic debate, on one hand, or reserved for the rarified talents of experts, on the other. In my view, sound political judgment emerges from careful considerations that all citizens are capable of, provided they commit themselves to engaging in continuous reflection.
2017
Political science
Philosophy
Ancient history
Aristotle; Democracy; Judgment; Plato; Thucydides
eng
Doctor of Philosophy
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Susan
Bickford
Thesis advisor
Stephen
Leonard
Thesis advisor
Michael
Lienesch
Thesis advisor
Jeff
Spinner-Halev
Thesis advisor
C.D.C.
Reeve
Thesis advisor
text
2017-05
Miller_unc_0153D_16905.pdf
uuid:56e418c6-f1ec-4f5a-af23-4d297550d2f3
2019-07-06T00:00:00
2017-04-16T02:39:24Z
proquest
yes
application/pdf
1808475