ingest
cdrApp
2018-03-15T16:01:00.507Z
d591f2cd-3da7-4b31-9dd8-ee27dcb6a3ee
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2018-03-15T16:01:51.482Z
Setting exclusive relation
addDatastream
MD_TECHNICAL
fedoraAdmin
2018-03-15T16:02:02.745Z
Adding technical metadata derived by FITS
addDatastream
MD_FULL_TEXT
fedoraAdmin
2018-03-15T16:02:25.645Z
Adding full text metadata extracted by Apache Tika
modifyDatastreamByValue
RELS-EXT
fedoraAdmin
2018-03-15T16:02:47.623Z
Setting exclusive relation
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-05-17T18:57:39.752Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-07-11T05:50:58.488Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-07-18T02:05:25.226Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-08-16T15:16:53.497Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-09-27T01:47:43.709Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2018-10-12T02:17:39.076Z
modifyDatastreamByValue
MD_DESCRIPTIVE
cdrApp
2019-03-20T20:38:00.574Z
Jennifer
Morgan
Author
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
Summer 2017
2017
Public health
Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Social interactions, Tobacco, Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Health Behavior
Noel
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Social interactions, Tobacco, Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Health Behavior
Noel
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Social interactions, Tobacco, Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Health Behavior
Noel
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Social interactions, Tobacco, Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Health Behavior
Noel
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Social interactions, Tobacco, Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
Health Behavior
Noel T.
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Degree granting institution
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication; Interpersonal Communication; Social interactions; Tobacco; Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
Health Behavior
Noel T.
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Degree granting institution
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Social interactions, Tobacco, Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Health Behavior
Noel T.
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
Jennifer
Morgan
Creator
Department of Health Behavior
Gillings School of Global Public Health
SOCIAL INTERACTIONS ABOUT PICTORIAL CIGARETTE PACK WARNINGS
Introduction. Social interactions are a key mechanism through which health communication efforts, including pictorial cigarette pack warnings, may exert their effects. We sought to better understand social interactions elicited by pictorial cigarette pack warnings.
Methods. US adult smokers (n=2,149) participated in a controlled trial that randomly assigned them to have their cigarette packs labeled with pictorial or text-only warnings for four weeks. Surveys assessed the number of conversations, theoretical mechanisms, and conversational content during the baseline visit and each of the subsequent four weekly visits.
Results. Smokers with pictorial warnings had more conversations throughout the trial compared to those with text-only warnings (8.2 conversations vs. 5.0, p<.01). Smokers with pictorial warnings were more likely than those with text-only warnings to discuss the health effects of smoking and whether the warnings would make them want to quit (both p<.05). The number of conversations about the warnings mediated the relationship between exposure to pictorial warnings and quit attempts (p<.001). In serial mediation analysis examining possible theoretical mechanisms, the number of conversations increased cognitive elaboration, which in turn increased quit attempts (p<.001). Conversations during the first week were more common among smokers who were younger, white, low-income, had greater perceived message effectiveness, and had stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings (all p <.05). Conversations declined during the second week, but these declines were more gradual for minority and older smokers, leading to more conversations throughout the study.
Conclusions. Pictorial warnings sparked more conversations about the warnings, the health effects of smoking, and quitting smoking than text-only warnings. These social interactions may extend the reach of pictorial warnings beyond the targeted smoker. These results indicate that cognitive elaboration is a possible theoretical mechanism that explains why conversations about pictorial warnings influence quit attempts. Conversations about cigarette pack warnings decreased over time. Greater perceived message effectiveness of the warnings and stronger negative emotional reactions to the warnings were associated with more conversations during the first week of smoking from packs with pictorial warnings. These results support designing warnings to increase conversations about the warnings.
2017-08
2017
Public health
Communication; Interpersonal Communication; Social interactions; Tobacco; Warnings
eng
Doctor of Public Health
Dissertation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School
Degree granting institution
Noel T.
Brewer
Thesis advisor
Shelley
Golden
Thesis advisor
Seth
Noar
Thesis advisor
Kurt
Ribisl
Thesis advisor
Brian
Southwell
Thesis advisor
text
Morgan_unc_0153D_17344.pdf
uuid:090717ba-2a42-464e-8718-d25db617d2ad
2019-12-31T00:00:00
2017-09-12T13:53:14Z
proquest
application/pdf
2375515