ingest cdrApp 2018-06-13T18:31:14.020Z 51cd2fe2-3fd7-401f-a923-a97bc3db68a2 modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT fedoraAdmin 2018-06-13T19:34:08.765Z Setting exclusive relation addDatastream MD_TECHNICAL fedoraAdmin 2018-06-13T19:34:20.130Z Adding technical metadata derived by FITS addDatastream MD_FULL_TEXT fedoraAdmin 2018-06-13T19:34:42.742Z Adding full text metadata extracted by Apache Tika modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT fedoraAdmin 2018-06-13T19:34:54.173Z Setting exclusive relation modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-07-11T15:54:24.526Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-08-21T20:16:32.299Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-09-27T21:30:52.629Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-10-12T11:35:47.331Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-10-17T16:54:14.361Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2019-03-21T21:53:19.513Z Minji Jang Author Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Microaggressions and the Problem of Invisible Wrongdoers I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. Spring 2018 2018 Philosophy Microaggression, Oppression, Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Philosophy Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas Hill, Jr. Thesis advisor text Minji Jang Author Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Microaggressions and the Problem of Invisible Wrongdoers I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. Spring 2018 2018 Philosophy Microaggression, Oppression, Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Philosophy Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas Hill Jr. Thesis advisor text Minji Jang Author Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Microaggressions and the Problem of Invisible Wrongdoers I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. Spring 2018 2018 Philosophy Microaggression, Oppression, Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Thesis Philosophy Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas E. Hill Thesis advisor text University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Degree granting institution Minji Jang Creator Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Microaggressions and the Problem of Invisible Wrongdoers I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. Philosophy Microaggression; Oppression; Philosophy of Gender; Race; and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Masters Thesis Philosophy Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas E. Hill Thesis advisor text University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Degree granting institution 2018 2018-05 Minji Jang Author Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Microaggressions and the Problem of Invisible Wrongdoers I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. Spring 2018 2018 Philosophy Microaggression, Oppression, Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Philosophy Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas E. Hill Thesis advisor text Minji Jang Author Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences Microaggressions and the Problem of Invisible Wrongdoers I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. Spring 2018 2018 Philosophy Microaggression, Oppression, Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Thesis Philosophy Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas E. Hill Thesis advisor text University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Degree granting institution Minji Jang Creator Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences I argue that victims of microaggressions suffer from the problem of invisible wrongdoers, where they cannot properly respond to everyday injustice of which they become the targets, because they cannot identify these events as wrongdoings and perpetrators as culpable wrongdoers. I identify the causes of this problem as: (1) the recent transformation of explicit, 'old-fashioned' discriminations into implicit, 'modern' forms, and (2) our focus on the macroscopic perspective to examine the moral significance of oppressive practices. I propose that we tackle this problem by extending our discussion to the microscopic level. In this paper, I offer a positive account of why microaggressions are moral offenses that merit blaming and critical responses from victims, and respond to three excuses given by perpetrators of microaggressions, namely, (1) that the act itself was trivial, (2) that the agents were well-intentioned, and (3) that they were non-culpably ignorant at the time of offense. 2018-05 2018 Philosophy Microaggression; Oppression; Philosophy of Gender; Race; and Sexuality eng Master of Arts Masters Thesis Susan Wolf Thesis advisor Luc Bovens Thesis advisor Thomas E. Hill Thesis advisor text University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Degree granting institution Jang_unc_0153M_17722.pdf uuid:1c485e09-0924-4bff-a1ca-213e2936ad3a 2020-06-13T00:00:00 2018-04-11T14:12:08Z proquest application/pdf 440388