ingest cdrApp 2017-07-05T20:18:24.859Z d36eae88-cb6b-42c1-ba08-197eadfa9868 modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT fedoraAdmin 2017-07-05T20:39:50.313Z Setting exclusive relation modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT fedoraAdmin 2017-07-05T20:39:50.828Z Setting exclusive relation addDatastream MD_TECHNICAL fedoraAdmin 2017-07-05T20:39:58.990Z Adding technical metadata derived by FITS modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT fedoraAdmin 2017-07-05T20:40:15.448Z Setting exclusive relation addDatastream MD_FULL_TEXT fedoraAdmin 2017-07-05T20:40:23.700Z Adding full text metadata extracted by Apache Tika modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT fedoraAdmin 2017-07-05T20:40:32.194Z Setting exclusive relation modifyDatastreamByValue RELS-EXT cdrApp 2017-07-06T11:39:07.405Z Setting exclusive relation modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-01-25T08:09:26.653Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-01-27T08:35:09.890Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-02-28T19:57:34.409Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-03-14T05:10:40.607Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-05-17T16:43:30.768Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-07-11T03:35:59.909Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-07-17T23:54:10.288Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-08-15T20:02:23.653Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-09-21T20:20:31.307Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-09-26T23:40:00.435Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2018-10-12T00:14:18.898Z modifyDatastreamByValue MD_DESCRIPTIVE cdrApp 2019-03-20T18:09:20.226Z Li Zhen Lim Author Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. Spring 2017 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. Spring 2017 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. Spring 2017 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. Spring 2017 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017-05 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo J. Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Degree granting institution Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT; Diagnosis; Intraosseous; Panoramic; Pathology; Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo J. Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Degree granting institution Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Comparing Panoramic Radiographs and CBCT: Impact on Radiographic Features and Differential Diagnoses Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT, Diagnosis, Intraosseous, Panoramic, Pathology, Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo J. Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 Li Zhen Lim Creator Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program School of Dentistry Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is known to have many advantages over panoramic radiography (PAN). However, few studies quantitatively demonstrate the benefits of CBCT for imaging intraosseous pathology. The aims of this study were to determine whether lesion features appear differently on PAN and CBCT, and the clinical impact of CBCT vs PAN. Three oral radiologists reviewed 33 sets of PANs and CBCTs of biopsy-proven lesions, described lesion features and provided up to three ranked differential diagnoses and their confidence levels associated with each diagnosis. Confidence levels were weighted by the rank at which the correct diagnosis was provided. Differences were present between PAN and CBCT with respect to lesion border definition, continuity of corticated borders, effect on neurovascular canals, expansion, cortical thinning and destruction. There was no association between the two modalities and the rank at which the correct differential diagnoses was made, or with the observers’ weighted confidence levels. 2017 Medical imaging CBCT; Diagnosis; Intraosseous; Panoramic; Pathology; Radiographic signs eng Master of Science Masters Thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Graduate School Degree granting institution Donald Tyndall Thesis advisor Glenn Reside Thesis advisor Ricardo J. Padilla Thesis advisor text 2017-05 Lim_unc_0153M_16902.pdf uuid:c5f5769c-fd0d-4186-8e1d-78dc7b971787 2019-07-05T00:00:00 proquest 2017-04-14T06:43:04Z application/pdf 2781048 yes