Association between mammographic density and basal-like and luminal A breast cancer subtypes
Public DepositedAdd to collection
You do not have access to any existing collections. You may create a new collection.
Downloadable Content
Download PDFCitation
MLA
Razzaghi, Hilda, et al. Association Between Mammographic Density and Basal-like and Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtypes. BioMed Central Ltd, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17615/n08z-n990APA
Razzaghi, H., Troester, M., Gierach, G., Olshan, A., Yankaskas, B., & Millikan, R. (2013). Association between mammographic density and basal-like and luminal A breast cancer subtypes. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.17615/n08z-n990Chicago
Razzaghi, Hilda, Melissa Troester, Gretchen L Gierach, Andrew Olshan, Bonnie C Yankaskas, and Robert C Millikan. 2013. Association Between Mammographic Density and Basal-Like and Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtypes. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.17615/n08z-n990- Creator
-
Razzaghi, Hilda
- Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
- Other Affiliation: National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30345, USA
-
Troester, Melissa
- Affiliation: N.C. Cancer Hospital, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
-
Gierach, Gretchen L
- Other Affiliation: Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
-
Olshan, Andrew
- Affiliation: N.C. Cancer Hospital, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
-
Yankaskas, Bonnie C
- Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Radiology
-
Millikan, Robert C.
- Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
- Abstract
- Abstract: Introduction: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer overall, but few studies have examined the association between mammographic density and specific subtypes of breast cancer, especially aggressive basal-like breast cancers. Because basal-like breast cancers are less frequently screen-detected, it is important to understand how mammographic density relates to risk of basal-like breast cancer. Methods: We estimated associations between mammographic density and breast cancer risk according to breast cancer subtype. Cases and controls were participants in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) who also had mammograms recorded in the Carolina Mammography Registry (CMR). A total of 491 cases had mammograms within five years prior to and one year after diagnosis and 528 controls had screening or diagnostic mammograms close to the dates of selection into CBCS. Mammographic density was reported to the CMR using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories. The expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 and 2 (HER1 and HER2), and cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) were assessed by immunohistochemistry and dichotomized as positive or negative, with ER+ and/or PR+, and HER2- tumors classified as luminal A and ER-, PR-, HER2-, HER1+ and/or CK5/6+ tumors classified as basal-like breast cancer. Triple negative tumors were defined as negative for ER, PR and HER2. Of the 491 cases 175 were missing information on subtypes; the remaining cases included 181 luminal A, 17 luminal B, 48 basal-like, 29 ER-/PR-/HER2+, and 41 unclassified subtypes. Odds ratios comparing each subtype to all controls and case-case odds ratios comparing mammographic density distributions in basal-like to luminal A breast cancers were estimated using logistic regression. Results: Mammographic density was associated with increased risk of both luminal A and basal-like breast cancers, although estimates were imprecise. The magnitude of the odds ratio associated with mammographic density was not substantially different between basal-like and luminal A cancers in case–control analyses and case-case analyses (case-case OR = 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.30, 3.84)). Conclusions: These results suggest that risk estimates associated with mammographic density are not distinct for separate breast cancer subtypes (basal-like/triple negative vs. luminal A breast cancers). Studies with a larger number of basal-like breast cancers are needed to confirm our findings.
- Date of publication
- September 4, 2013
- DOI
- Identifier
- 24008056
- https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3470
- Resource type
- Article
- Rights statement
- In Copyright
- Rights holder
- Hilda Razzaghi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
- License
- Journal title
- Breast Cancer Research
- Journal volume
- 15
- Journal issue
- 5
- Page start
- R76
- Language
- English
- Is the article or chapter peer-reviewed?
- Yes
- ISSN
- 1465-5411
- Bibliographic citation
- Breast Cancer Research. 2013 Sep 04;15(5):R76
- Publisher
- BioMed Central Ltd
- Access right
- Open Access
- Date uploaded
- January 20, 2017
Relations
- Parents:
This work has no parents.
Items
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|
13058_2013_article_3267.pdf | 2019-05-06 | Public | Download |