Development and evaluation of a new survey instrument to measure the quality of colorectal cancer screening decisions
Public DepositedAdd to collection
You do not have access to any existing collections. You may create a new collection.
Downloadable Content
Download PDFCitation
MLA
Sepucha, Karen R, et al. Development and Evaluation of a New Survey Instrument to Measure the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions. BioMed Central Ltd, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17615/denv-n973APA
Sepucha, K., Feibelmann, S., Cosenza, C., Levin, C., & Pignone, M. (2014). Development and evaluation of a new survey instrument to measure the quality of colorectal cancer screening decisions. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.17615/denv-n973Chicago
Sepucha, Karen R, Sandra Feibelmann, Carol Cosenza, Carrie A Levin, and Michael Pignone. 2014. Development and Evaluation of a New Survey Instrument to Measure the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.17615/denv-n973- Creator
-
Sepucha, Karen R
- Other Affiliation: Division of General Internal Medicine, Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, 8th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
-
Feibelmann, Sandra
- Other Affiliation: Division of General Internal Medicine, Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, 8th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA
-
Cosenza, Carol
- Other Affiliation: Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125, USA
-
Levin, Carrie A
- Other Affiliation: Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, 40 Court Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02108, USA
-
Pignone, Michael
- Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology
- Abstract
- Abstract Background Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening recommend that patients be informed about options and be able to select preferred method of screening; however, there are no existing measures available to assess whether this happens. Methods Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Quality Instrument (CRC-DQI) includes knowledge items and patients' goals and concerns. Items were generated through literature review and qualitative work with patients and providers. Hypotheses relating to the acceptability, feasibility, discriminant validity and retest reliability of the survey were examined using data from three studies: (1) 2X2 randomized study of participants recruited online, (2) cross-sectional sample of patients recruited in community health clinics, and (3) cross-sectional sample of providers recruited from American Medical Association Master file. Results 338 participants were recruited online, 94 participants were recruited from community health centers, and 115 physicians were recruited. The CRC-DQI was feasible and acceptable with low missing data and high response rates for both online and paper-based administrations. The knowledge score was able to discriminate between those who had seen a decision aid or not (84% vs. 64%, p < 0.001) and between providers, online patients and clinic patients (89% vs. 74% vs. 41%, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The knowledge score and most of the goals had adequate retest reliability. About half of the participants received a test that matched their goals (47% and 51% in online and clinic samples respectively). Many respondents who had never been screened had goals that indicated a preference for colonoscopy. A minority of respondents in the online (21%) and in clinic (2%) samples were both well informed and received a test that matched their goals. Conclusions The CRC-DQI demonstrated good psychometric properties in diverse samples, and across different modes of administration. Few respondents made high quality decisions about colon cancer screening.
- Date of publication
- August 20, 2014
- DOI
- Identifier
- Resource type
- Article
- Rights statement
- In Copyright
- Rights holder
- Karen R Sepucha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
- License
- Journal title
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Journal volume
- 14
- Journal issue
- 1
- Page start
- 72
- Language
- English
- Is the article or chapter peer-reviewed?
- Yes
- ISSN
- 1472-6947
- Bibliographic citation
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2014 Aug 20;14(1):72
- Publisher
- BioMed Central Ltd
- Access right
- Open Access
- Date uploaded
- August 26, 2015
Relations
- Parents:
This work has no parents.
Items
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|
1472-6947-14-72.pdf | 2019-05-06 | Public | Download | |
CRC-DQI field test items. | 2019-05-06 | Public | Download |