Representing Wonders and Legends: Painted Illustrations in the Süleymaniye Book of Roger (1469) and the Bodleian Book of Curiosities (12th-13th c.)
Public DepositedAdd to collection
You do not have access to any existing collections. You may create a new collection.
Downloadable Content
Download PDFCitation
MLA
Molina, Sarah. Representing Wonders and Legends: Painted Illustrations In the Süleymaniye Book of Roger (1469) and the Bodleian Book of Curiosities (12th-13th C.). 2016. https://doi.org/10.17615/fdyv-cq53APA
Molina, S. (2016). Representing Wonders and Legends: Painted Illustrations in the Süleymaniye Book of Roger (1469) and the Bodleian Book of Curiosities (12th-13th c.). https://doi.org/10.17615/fdyv-cq53Chicago
Molina, Sarah. 2016. Representing Wonders and Legends: Painted Illustrations In the Süleymaniye Book of Roger (1469) and the Bodleian Book of Curiosities (12th-13th C.). https://doi.org/10.17615/fdyv-cq53- Last Modified
- February 26, 2019
- Creator
-
Molina, Sarah
- Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Art and Art History, Art History
- Abstract
- Two of the earliest and most significant illustrated cartographic manuscripts in the Arab- Islamic tradition include The Delight of Him Who Desires to Journey Through the Climates, more commonly known as The Book of Roger, (c. 1154) and The Book of Curiosities of the Sciences and Marvels for the Eye (11th century). An encyclopedic volume of the world, The Book of Roger was compiled by Abu Abdullah Mohammed Ibn al-Sharif al-Idrisi for King Roger II of Sicily and contains a comprehensive account of geography, history, and culture. An unknown author who most likely lived in Egypt wrote and illustrated The Book of Curiosities, which consists of two parts—ten chapters concerning the celestial world order and twenty-five chapters describing earthly matters. This paper focuses on a 12th- or 13th-century copy of The Book of Curiosities held at the Bodleian Library of Oxford (MS Arab. c. 90) and a copy of The Book of Roger made in 1469 by the copyist ‘Ali ibn Hasan al-‘Ajami and owned by the Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi in Istanbul (MS Fazil Ahmed Paşa 955). Not only are these two of the most complete copies of their respective works, but these manuscripts also include additional illustrations that cannot be found in any other version of The Book of Roger or The Book of Curiosities (Figures 1-3). These added illustrations, inserted by a later reader or owner in the case of The Book of Curiosities and included by the copyist in The Book of Roger, provide an alternative conception of manuscripts. The manuscript is not a singular production of al-Idrisi or the unknown Egyptian author but a complex anthology of thought—the “final copy” can be understood as a compilation of perspectives from the original author, the author’s sources, the copyist, and later readers or owners. The three added illustrations of The Book of Roger and The Book of Curiosities range in subject matter, but they all include written captions and are framed by borders drawn in red or reddish brown ink. The two illustrations from The Book of Curiosities have been painted onto pages originally left blank—these pages were left blank to accommodate a large circular world map that can found at the end of the manuscript’s first book. One of these added illustrations depicts the legendary Waqwaq tree, a human-tree hybrid well-documented in early medieval travel literature and reported to exist at the edge of the world. The other illustration, painted on the facing page, is described by its caption as a “marvelous melon” plant and depicts fanciful animal heads growing from a leafy plant. Al-‘Ajami, the 15th-century copyist of The Book of Roger, chose to add his illustration in the midst of transcribing the manuscript. This additional illustration of the lands of Gog and Magog, a popular apocalyptic legend recorded in both Bible and the Qur’an, can be found in the midst of al-Idrisi’s textual description of the legend.6 Although I will examine the visual elements and conceptual implications of each illustration separately, analyzing the three together provokes larger questions about the discourse of painted illustrations in manuscripts and the purposes of cartography in the medieval era. This paper seeks to contextualize the three illustrations in their respective manuscripts and the later periods during which they were created or inserted. To contextualize these three illustrations, I use four different lenses—geography, cosmography, wonder, and legends—to encompass the multiplicity of perspectives that medieval readers might have utilized to understand these manuscripts and the world around them. Ultimately, I use these four frameworks to elucidate the following arguments: 1) the insertion of painted illustrations reflects a tradition of using the visual arts to convey wonder; 2) the descriptions and illustrations of wondrous creatures and places convey conceptual boundaries between the center and the edge of the world; and 3) these inserted illustrations might have inspired curiosity and travel to faraway lands while simultaneously affirming the centrality of the reader’s known world.
- Date of publication
- spring 2016
- Keyword
- DOI
- Resource type
- Rights statement
- In Copyright
- Note
- Funding: Morehead-Cain Foundation (Also just a note on the thesis, all of the images are contained on the supplemental file. Would it be possible for this file to be linked to the PDF of the written text for my thesis?)
- Advisor
- Anderson, Glaire
- Degree
- Bachelor of Arts
- Honors level
- Highest Honors
- Degree granting institution
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Extent
- 38
Relations
- Parents:
This work has no parents.
Items
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis | 2019-05-17 | Public | Download | |
Thesis_Images_SarahMolina.pdf | 2019-05-17 | Public | Download |