Evaluating methods for the analysis of rare variants in sequence data

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Luedtke, Alexander
    • Other Affiliation: Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA
  • Powers, Scott
    • Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics and Operations Research
  • Petersen, Ashley
    • Other Affiliation: Departments of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, St. Olaf College, 1520 St. Olaf Avenue, Northfield, MN 55057, USA
  • Sitarik, Alexandra
    • Other Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Wittenberg University, 200 West Ward Street, PO Box 720, Springfield, OH 45501, USA
  • Bekmetjev, Airat
    • Other Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Dordt College, 498 4th Ave NE, Sioux Center, IA 51250, USA
  • Tintle, Nathan L
    • Other Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Dordt College, 498 4th Ave NE, Sioux Center, IA 51250, USA
Abstract
  • Abstract A number of rare variant statistical methods have been proposed for analysis of the impending wave of next-generation sequencing data. To date, there are few direct comparisons of these methods on real sequence data. Furthermore, there is a strong need for practical advice on the proper analytic strategies for rare variant analysis. We compare four recently proposed rare variant methods (combined multivariate and collapsing, weighted sum, proportion regression, and cumulative minor allele test) on simulated phenotype and next-generation sequencing data as part of Genetic Analysis Workshop 17. Overall, we find that all analyzed methods have serious practical limitations on identifying causal genes. Specifically, no method has more than a 5% true discovery rate (percentage of truly causal genes among all those identified as significantly associated with the phenotype). Further exploration shows that all methods suffer from inflated false-positive error rates (chance that a noncausal gene will be identified as associated with the phenotype) because of population stratification and gametic phase disequilibrium between noncausal SNPs and causal SNPs. Furthermore, observed true-positive rates (chance that a truly causal gene will be identified as significantly associated with the phenotype) for each of the four methods was very low (<19%). The combination of larger than anticipated false-positive rates, low true-positive rates, and only about 1% of all genes being causal yields poor discriminatory ability for all four methods. Gametic phase disequilibrium and population stratification are important areas for further research in the analysis of rare variant data.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Rights holder
  • Alexander Luedtke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
License
Language
  • English
Is the article or chapter peer-reviewed?
  • Yes
Bibliographic citation
  • BMC Proceedings. 2011 Nov 29;5(Suppl 9):S119
Publisher
  • BioMed Central Ltd
Access right
  • Open Access
Date uploaded
  • August 23, 2012

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 1753-6561-5-S9-S119.pdf 2019-05-07 Public Download
file details 1753-6561-5-S9-S119.xml 2019-05-07 Public Download