Teachers and sanitation promotion: an assessment of community-led total sanitation in Ethiopia

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Crocker, Jonny
  • Geremew, Abiyot
    • Other Affiliation: Plan International Ethiopia
  • Atalie, Fisseha
    • Other Affiliation: Plan International Ethiopia
  • Yetie, Messele
    • Other Affiliation: Plan International Ethiopia
  • Bartram, Jamie
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health
Abstract
  • Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a participatory approach to addressing open defecation that has demonstrated success in previous studies, yet there is no research on how implementation arrangements and context change effectiveness. We used a quasi-experimental study design to compare two interventions in Ethiopia: conventional CLTS in which health workers and local leaders provided facilitation and an alternative approach in which teachers provided facilitation. In 2012, Plan International Ethiopia trained teachers from 111 villages and health workers and leaders from 54 villages in CLTS facilitation. The trained facilitators then implemented CLTS in their respective villages for a year. Latrine ownership, use, and quality were measured with household surveys. Differences between interventions were explored using surveys and interviews. The decrease in open defecation associated with teacher-facilitated CLTS was 8.2 percentage points smaller than for conventional CLTS (p = 0.048). Teachers had competing responsibilities and initially lacked support from local leaders, which may have lessened their success. Teachers may be more appropriate for a supporting rather than leading role in sanitation promotion because they did demonstrate ability and engagement. Open defecation decreased by 15.3 percentage points overall but did not change where baseline open defecation was below 30%. Ownership of a latrine with stable flooring increased by 8.7 percentage points overall. Improved latrine ownership did not change during the intervention. CLTS is most appropriate where open defecation is high because there were no significant changes in sanitation practices or latrine upgrades where baseline open defecation was low.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Related resource URL
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Journal title
  • Environmental Science & Technology
Journal volume
  • 50
Journal issue
  • 12
Page start
  • 6517
Page end
  • 6525
Language
  • English

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 2016_Crocker et al._Teachers and sanitation promotion an assessment of community-led total sanitation in Ethiopia.pdf 2019-05-03 Public Download