Policy substance or simplified politics?: how the healthcare reform public option was portrayed in newspaper editorials

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Last Modified
  • March 21, 2019
Creator
  • Kelly, Carol Bain
    • Affiliation: Hussman School of Journalism and Media
Abstract
  • This thesis examined the portrayal of the public option proposal for healthcare reform in newspaper editorials during the height of Congressional debate and media attention, June through December 2009. Using a mixed-methods approach, a quantitative content analysis determined editorial stance and compared different United States regions to one another, and a qualitative textual analysis identified and illustrated frames in editorials. Overall, 62% of editorials supported the public option, 21% opposed it, and 17% remained balanced. Social, ethical and political values applicable to healthcare reform guided the qualitative analysis. Cost control, greediness and pure politics were the primary themes. The social and ethical frames considered healthcare provision remedies and societal rights while the political frame was concerned with characterizations, drama and strategy about the public option. Divergent perspectives about individual freedom and responsibility for the provision of health insurance marked the debate. Editorials contained both policy substance and simplified politics.
Date of publication
DOI
Resource type
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Note
  • "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication."
Advisor
  • Johnston, Anne
Language
Publisher
Place of publication
  • Chapel Hill, NC
Access right
  • Open access
Date uploaded
  • March 18, 2013

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 2019-04-11 Public Download