A Comparison of Subscribed and Non-subscribed Titles in the Springer Link Electronic Journal Package

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Last Modified
  • February 28, 2019
Creator
  • Lafferty, Meghan
    • Affiliation: School of Information and Library Science
Abstract
  • Bundled electronic journal packages which include all of a publisher's journal titles have been criticized for weakening collections with the inclusion of titles collection developers would not have otherwise selected. Others have claimed it is best to give patrons access to as much information as possible. This study compared the usage of titles to which the University of North Carolina (UNC) subscribes with non-subscribed titles included in the Springer Link electronic journal package. The Chemical Sciences and Medicine subsets of the Springer Link collection were also examined. The results indicated that titles to which UNC subscribes received over five times as much use and were more likely to receive any use at all than non-subscribed titles.
Date of publication
Subject
DOI
Resource type
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Advisor
  • Losee, Robert
Degree granting institution
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Language
Extent
  • 74 p.
Access right
  • Open access
Date uploaded
  • December 10, 2010

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details A Comparison of Subscribed and Non-subscribed Titles in the Springer Link Electronic Journal Package. 2019-05-13 Public Download