The meaning and measurement of implementation climate

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Weiner, Bryan
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management
  • Belden, Charles M
    • Affiliation: Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management
  • Bergmire, Dawn M
    • Affiliation: Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research
  • Johnston, Matthew
    • Affiliation: Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research
Abstract
  • Abstract Background Climate has a long history in organizational studies, but few theoretical models integrate the complex effects of climate during innovation implementation. In 1996, a theoretical model was proposed that organizations could develop a positive climate for implementation by making use of various policies and practices that promote organizational members' means, motives, and opportunities for innovation use. The model proposes that implementation climate--or the extent to which organizational members perceive that innovation use is expected, supported, and rewarded--is positively associated with implementation effectiveness. The implementation climate construct holds significant promise for advancing scientific knowledge about the organizational determinants of innovation implementation. However, the construct has not received sufficient scholarly attention, despite numerous citations in the scientific literature. In this article, we clarify the meaning of implementation climate, discuss several measurement issues, and propose guidelines for empirical study. Discussion Implementation climate differs from constructs such as organizational climate, culture, or context in two important respects: first, it has a strategic focus (implementation), and second, it is innovation-specific. Measuring implementation climate is challenging because the construct operates at the organizational level, but requires the collection of multi-dimensional perceptual data from many expected innovation users within an organization. In order to avoid problems with construct validity, assessments of within-group agreement of implementation climate measures must be carefully considered. Implementation climate implies a high degree of within-group agreement in climate perceptions. However, researchers might find it useful to distinguish implementation climate level (the average of implementation climate perceptions) from implementation climate strength (the variability of implementation climate perceptions). It is important to recognize that the implementation climate construct applies most readily to innovations that require collective, coordinated behavior change by many organizational members both for successful implementation and for realization of anticipated benefits. For innovations that do not possess these attributes, individual-level theories of behavior change could be more useful in explaining implementation effectiveness. Summary This construct has considerable value in implementation science, however, further debate and development is necessary to refine and distinguish the construct for empirical use.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Rights holder
  • Bryan J Weiner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
License
Journal title
  • Implementation Science
Journal volume
  • 6
Journal issue
  • 1
Page start
  • 78
Language
  • English
Is the article or chapter peer-reviewed?
  • Yes
ISSN
  • 1748-5908
Bibliographic citation
  • Implementation Science. 2011 Jul 22;6(1):78
Publisher
  • BioMed Central Ltd
Access right
  • Open Access
Date uploaded
  • July 9, 2016

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 13012_2011_article_382.pdf 2019-05-07 Public Download
file details 13012_2011_382_moesm1_esm.pdf 2019-05-07 Public Download