Back to Results

< Previous   Next >

Insulin resistance and circadian rhythm of cardiac autonomic modulation

Creators: Rodríguez-Colón, Sol M, Li, Xian, Shaffer, Michele L, He, Fan, Bixler, Edward O, Vgontzas, Alexandros N, Cai, Jianwen, Liao, Duanping

File Type: pdf | Filesize: 357.5 KB | Date Added: 2012-08-23 | Date Created: 2010-12-06

Abstract Background Insulin resistance (IR) has been associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Heart rate variability (HRV), an index of cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM), is also associated with CVD mortality and CVD morbidity. Currently, there are limited data about the impairment of IR on the circadian pattern of CAM. Therefore, we conducted this investigation to exam the association between IR and the circadian oscillations of CAM in a community-dwelling middle-aged sample. Method Homeostasis models of IR (HOMA-IR), insulin, and glucose were used to assess IR. CAM was measured by HRV analysis from a 24-hour electrocardiogram. Two stage modeling was used in the analysis. In stage one, for each individual we fit a cosine periodic model based on the 48 segments of HRV data. We obtained three individual-level cosine parameters that quantity the circadian pattern: mean (M), measures the overall average of a HRV index; amplitude (&#194;), measures the amplitude of the oscillation of a HRV index; and acrophase time (&#952;), measures the timing of the highest oscillation. At the second stage, we used a random-effects-meta-analysis to summarize the effects of IR variables on the three circadian parameters of HRV indices obtained in stage one of the analysis. Results In persons without type diabetes, the multivariate adjusted &#946; (SE) of log HOMA-IR and M variable for HRV were -0.251 (0.093), -0.245 (0.078), -0.19 (0.06), -4.89 (1.76), -3.35 (1.31), and 2.14 (0.995), for log HF, log LF, log VLF, SDNN, RMSSD and HR, respectively (all P &lt; 0.05). None of the IR variables were significantly associated with &#194; or &#952; of the HRV indices. However, in eight type 2 diabetics, the magnitude of effect due to higher HOMA-IR on M, &#194;, and &#952; are much larger. Conclusion Elevated IR, among non-diabetics significantly impairs the overall mean levels of CAM. However, the &#194; or &#952; of CAM were not significantly affected by IR, suggesting that the circadian mechanisms of CAM are not impaired. However, among persons with type 2 diabetes, a group clinically has more severe form of IR, the adverse effects of increased IR on all three HRV circadian parameters are much larger.