The Rodin-Ohno hypothesis that two enzyme superfamilies descended from one ancestral gene: an unlikely scenario for the origins of translation that will not be dismissed

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Creator
  • Carter, Charles
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Li, Li
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Weinreb, Violetta
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Collier, Martha
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Gonzalez-Rivera, Katiria
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Jimenez-Rodriguez, Mariel
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Erdogan, Ozgün
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Kuhlman, Brian
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Ambroggio, Xavier
    • Other Affiliation: Rosetta Design Group LLC
  • Williams, Tishan
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Chandrasekharan, S Niranj
    • Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Abstract
  • Background Because amino acid activation is rate-limiting for uncatalyzed protein synthesis, it is a key puzzle in understanding the origin of the genetic code. Two unrelated classes (I and II) of contemporary aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) now translate the code. Observing that codons for the most highly conserved, Class I catalytic peptides, when read in the reverse direction, are very nearly anticodons for Class II defining catalytic peptides, Rodin and Ohno proposed that the two superfamilies descended from opposite strands of the same ancestral gene. This unusual hypothesis languished for a decade, perhaps because it appeared to be unfalsifiable. Results The proposed sense/antisense alignment makes important predictions. Fragments that align in antiparallel orientations, and contain the respective active sites, should catalyze the same two reactions catalyzed by contemporary synthetases. Recent experiments confirmed that prediction. Invariant cores from both classes, called Urzymes after Ur = primitive, authentic, plus enzyme and representing ~20% of the contemporary structures, can be expressed and exhibit high, proportionate rate accelerations for both amino-acid activation and tRNA acylation. A major fraction (60%) of the catalytic rate acceleration by contemporary synthetases resides in segments that align sense/antisense. Bioinformatic evidence for sense/antisense ancestry extends to codons specifying the invariant secondary and tertiary structures outside the active sites of the two synthetase classes. Peptides from a designed, 46-residue gene constrained by Rosetta to encode Class I and II ATP binding sites with fully complementary sequences both accelerate amino acid activation by ATP ~400 fold. Conclusions Biochemical and bioinformatic results substantially enhance the posterior probability that ancestors of the two synthetase classes arose from opposite strands of the same ancestral gene. The remarkable acceleration by short peptides of the rate-limiting step in uncatalyzed protein synthesis, together with the synergy of synthetase Urzymes and their cognate tRNAs, introduce a new paradigm for the origin of protein catalysts, emphasize the potential relevance of an operational RNA code embedded in the tRNA acceptor stems, and challenge the RNA-World hypothesis. Reviewers This article was reviewed by Dr. Paul Schimmel (nominated by Laura Landweber), Dr. Eugene Koonin and Professor David Ardell.
Date of publication
DOI
Identifier
Resource type
  • Article
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Rights holder
  • Carter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Journal title
  • Biology Direct
Journal volume
  • 9
Journal issue
  • 1
Language
  • English
Bibliographic citation
  • Biology Direct. 2014 Jun 14;9(1):11
Publisher
  • BioMed Central

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details 13062_2014_article_403.pdf 2019-05-07 Public Download