Freedom in speech: freedom and liberty in U.S. presidential campaign discourse, 1952-2004

Public Deposited
Analytics

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Request Version for Screen Reader
Last Modified
  • March 20, 2019
Creator
  • Easter, Michele Martha
    • Affiliation: College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Sociology
Abstract
  • “Freedom” is a flexible and powerful word in the United States. Yet it has multiple, mutually exclusive definitions depending on who is invoking it and why. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “freedom from want” in the New Deal era suggests something quite different from “freedom from taxes” espoused by politicians in the ‘90s. To identify the varieties of freedom and liberty in American presidential campaign discourse and differences across political parties and over time, I analyzed 88 speeches from 28 Republican and Democratic presidential nominating conventions (1952-2004). About half of the 760 terms were defined in opposition to foreign enemies (usually Communist), and very few were critical of liberty. Republicans used freedom terminology more often than Democrats, and there was evidence that the two parties defined freedom differently. I found no linear trends in the quantity or type of freedom usage over time, but there appeared to be cyclical rises and falls.
Date of publication
DOI
Resource type
Rights statement
  • In Copyright
Advisor
  • Perrin, Andrew J.
Language
Access right
  • Open access
Date uploaded
  • October 19, 2010

Relations

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details Freedom in speech : freedom and liberty in U.S. presidential campaign discourse, 1952-2004 2019-04-12 Public Download